Thank you for agreeing to judge the awards at the 15th National Allied Health Conference
Please click here to view the judging schedule
Please select the relevant day below to enter your scores for presentations
Tuesday Presentations Score Card – Click Here – Tuesday Scores
Wednesday Presentations Score Card – Click Here – Wednesday Scores
Posters Score Card – Please click here to enter your score
Please click here to view the judging criteria
Judging Presentations
- Each assessor must make sure that they attend the sessions for which they have nominated.
- Each assessor must assess every nominated presentation in their session.
- Assessors are strongly encouraged to utilise the full range of marks (0-10) available for each criterion; where a criterion hasn’t been addressed at all, it should not receive any marks, whereas when the level at which a criterion is addressed is clearly excellent, assessors should give full marks.
- At the end of the session, the two assessors must confer and arrive at a consensus for each presenter. The single set of marks for each presenter (i.e. the consensus) must be uploaded via the conference app before the end of each day.
- Scoring will be completed via Google Forms, see above link.
|
Judging Posters
- Each assessor must independently assess every poster assigned to them.
- Assessors are strongly encouraged to utilise the full range of marks (0-10) available for each criterion; where a criterion hasn’t been addressed at all it should not receive any marks, whereas when the level at which a criterion is addressed is clearly excellent, assessors should give full marks.
- By the end of the poster session (Tuesday evening), the two assessors in each team must confer and arrive at a consensus for each poster. The single set of marks for each poster (i.e. the consensus) must be uploaded by the Team Leader via the conference app on Tuesday (by the end of the poster session).
- Scoring forms will be available via Google forms, see above link
|
Scoring
Each nomination must be given a NUMERICAL grade
| Unsatisfactory – 0 |
addressed none of the criteria |
| Basic 1 – 3 |
addressed the criteria with basic information |
| Good 4 – 6 |
Basic + expanded information with detail and relevant examples |
| Great 7 – 8 |
Good + some compelling information demonstrating contribution to Allied Health field |
| Exceptional 9 – 10 |
Great + compelling external feedback as support material, contribution to Allied Health field |