Overview of the Abstract Reviewing process
The Abstract Reviewing process will be overseen by the NAHC Organising Committee.
Reviewers will be required to score each abstract on a scale of 1 to 5 in respect to the following criteria:
(1 = Very Poor, 2 = Poor, 3 = Average, 4 = Good, 5 = Excellent)
- The subject is original, contemporary and significant / relevant.
- The concept, methodology and supporting theory is sound.
- The abstract is clearly written and organised coherently.
- The results / findings are informative and comprehensive.
- The topic is of broad appeal.
- The subject clearly addresses one or more of the conference themes.
In addition to scoring against the above criteria, reviewers are asked to make;
- a suggestion (if applicable) of an alternate theme group that better suits the abstract;
- a recommendation to accept, accept in alternate presentation type, or reject;
- where a submission has been nominated for an award, accept the nomination if you agree it is eligible (more information about Awards can be found here com.au/awards-program);
- and provide confidential comments/recommendations regarding the submission to the Committee